Text Box: Alternative Relativistic Theories And 
Correlating Philosophies of Science

17 November 2017

1.  Brown-Glazebrook-Baianu rethink on the structure of spacetime

AConceptualConstructionOfComplexityLevelsTheoryInSpacetimeCategorical.zip 

Adolf Grunbaum,  premier scientific philosopher of the last quarter of the 20th century  (108 MB so be patient with the download, please)

PhilosophicalProblemsofSpaceandTime.pdf 

3.  A generalized but astute take on modern geometry’s development

Torretti-PhilosophyOfGeometryFromRiemannToPoincare_text.pdf 

The next set of links concern various intriguing elucidations on the work of Abraham Zelmanov, one of many great luminaries of Russian mathematics and relativistic physics:

TractatusLogicoRealismus.pdf 

ZelmanovistUniversalInvariantTheory.pdf 

The Zelmanov Journal Website

Finally, China’s Dark Matter Explorer satellite project, the yardstick for empirically validating the above and other theories concerning the structure of space and time:

DarkMatterParticleExplorerMission.pdf 

The DAMPE-CERN connection

MECHANICAL CONSTRUCTION

COST ESTIMATES

 

TECHNICAL PROJECT DOCUMENT WRITING & EDITING

 

PURCHASING SERVICES

 

POWER PROJECT

LIFE CYCLE COSTING

 

PROGRESS REPORTING

 

INDUSTRIAL MARKET RESEARCH

 

SURPLUS ASSET VALUATION

 

POWER PLANT PROJECT FINANCE

BRIDGEWATERENERGY.NET

Power Plant  Project Admin Services

“a veteran-owned 1099 solopreneur enterprise”

 

CONTACT:  support at bridgewaterenergy dot net

Text Box: One of several “tuning forks” in our Universe

Unipolar gravity waves IMO are but one of several key levels of resonant and in-phase order which regulate and initiate various universal significant processes, though yet unidentified and unmetricated.  This lack of causal and synchronous links to known processes owes to no systematic approach to charting unipolar gravity waves’ topology which in turns owes to the lack of a semantic metamathematics to define unipolar gravity waves’ actual geometry relative to the known Universe.

For a definitive and clearly stated exposition of this conundrum please refer to this CalTech introductory presentation on the topic:  

 http://www.tapir.caltech.edu/~teviet/Waves/differences.html
Text Box: Updated Archive Holdings
28 February2017

Subject: defining the role of the tuning fork in the physical Universe

The focus here is on magnetic, optical spectrum and  electrodynamic engineering, the relationship between classical and relativistic cosmic physics, laser-like acoustic resonances in subatomic particles, in both forms of gravity waves, in sub-atomic super-cooled metals  and in stellar plasma.  This archive also provides the mathematical and philosophical tools to analyze these phenomena accurately: semantic logic, the various algebrae of many-valued logics and lastly, the evidence-based proofing theories needed for evaluating the specific technologies that in-phase and coherent resonances impact. Heisenbergian phenomena are also addressed to include a paper on the subject which Heisenberg wrote, translated for NASA in refreshingly clear language for the staff engineers of that era’s epic engineering & scientific  team.

In particular, the L119 files courtesy of the Russian Academy of Science’s Philosophy of Science Department as anthologized by Professor Karpenko  are important because they address two studiously-ignored problems of current physics and engineering:  how the proofing & measurement of simultaneity and causality impact current theory & practice respecting complex physical phenomena. These phenomena include  basic considerations such as climate, aircraft, nautical, architectural  and powerplant related fluid dynamics which significant factors the present-day fluid dynamicist rarely takes into account.


To download:  please prefix these file names with the URL of this site plus a forward slash then hit “return.”
Text Box: BOOKS ON GENERALLY-ACCEPTED 
STANDARDS OF SCIENTIFIC PROOF
21 October 2017

It matters not if your scientific concept or argument is brilliant, epoch-making and a New York Times bestseller.  You have to prove your results are correct or your scientific peers (and, more significantly, your engineering & industrial affiliates who usually pay for scientific research) kick you out of the game altogether.

The following are introductory books on the best methods for proving out your theorem or hypothesis.  They are provided with the intention to prepare you for dealing with the hardcore professional and therefore traceable standards.of proof which pharmaceutical, engineering, IT and agricultural concerns embrace and defend as a matter of course in doing business.

http://www.bridgewaterenergy.net/NAGELIntroductionToLogicAndScientificMethod.pdf

http://www.bridgewaterenergy.net/SovereignReasonAndOtherStudiesNagel.pdf

http://www.bridgewaterenergy.net/SystematicReadingsInEpistemologyNagel.pdf

And, as an example of great worth, here is a book describing how Godel went about it:

http://www.bridgewaterenergy.net/GodelsProofErnestNagel.pdf
Text Box: Provided as a professional courtesy by 

W. James O’Brien Associates
Text Box: BOSTON UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR 
PHILOSOPHY AND HISTORY OF SCIENCE 
ANNUAL COLLOQUIUM

This lively programmatic get-together typically covers topics as diverse as heuristics for multi-scale modeling in complex systems (as in nanostructures and supercomputer design) to experimental metaphysics.  This collection of video lectures  provides an excellent overview of the level of engagement by this institution in forming building blocks from which the scientific tools for the accumulation of knowledge are fabricated. 

http://www.bu.edu/cphs/colloquium/

PLEASE NOTE:

This website is to close down

permanently 18 Jan 2018